Skip to main content

2024-08-24 Team Meeting

·230 words·2 mins
  • Document the process of the ‘unconventional approach’ to science communication
  • Set up a website with meeting notes
  • Explore science communication evaluation framework
  • Communications strategy: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_back_of_the_envelope_guide_to_communications_strategy#
  • What’s the goal? Get people to engage with climate change more openly → make people more receptive to scientific information and increase intellectual humility → address information avoidance → decrease climate fatigue and despair → climate science and advocacy more proximal to people. Do we want the players to become? Climate activists? Informed citizens?
  • How to ensure that we don’t fall back to the “doomsday” narrative? Disengagement with the world we are currently in - distinct future/parallel universe. It is your world but fantastical element - situate our situation in another fantasy world that is similar enough but different. Make it fun, have in-jokes!
  • How to tackle climate deniers? Example of a nobel prize physicist denying climate change. How are average global temperature even measured? Sampling using satellites, dug up ices – and we are statistically confident of the reported average global temperature.
  • How do we communicate such facts and nuances? Leave the players with the same feeling as a complex art would, a discomfort or an uncomfortable feeling/ Create a story, like Wall-e and Parasite. Creative and critical.
  • Have scientists who are climate deniers as players? The player might have to make decisions that are “bad”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spec_Ops:_The_Line.
  • Ensure a fact-sheet or an AI assistant